<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pacoup.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacoup.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacoup.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash vs HTML5 Performance (Updated January 2012) by WP7 impervious to virus? - Windows Phone Forums at wpcentral.com</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/02/03/flash-vs-html5-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>WP7 impervious to virus? - Windows Phone Forums at wpcentral.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1657#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>[...] Hence Adobe giving up on it.    http://www.blackcj.com/blog/2010/09/...obile-devices/  Flash vs HTML5 Performance (Updated January 2012) &#124; Pacoup.com     Liked by              [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hence Adobe giving up on it.    <a href="http://www.blackcj.com/blog/2010/09/...obile-devices/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackcj.com/blog/2010/09/&#8230;obile-devices/</a>  Flash vs HTML5 Performance (Updated January 2012) | Pacoup.com     Liked by              [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Computing by Pacoup</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/01/07/the-future-of-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-12676</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1643#comment-12676</guid>
		<description>Oh, I get it now. Thanks! I&#039;ll update my article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I get it now. Thanks! I&#8217;ll update my article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash vs HTML5 Performance (Updated January 2012) by talk about haters... - Page 7 - BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/02/03/flash-vs-html5-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-12662</link>
		<dc:creator>talk about haters... - Page 7 - BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1657#comment-12662</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Computing by Jesse Scholtes</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/01/07/the-future-of-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-12647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Scholtes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1643#comment-12647</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to point out that capacitative touchscreens don&#039;t sense body heat. What they sense is the electrical conductivity of your finger. The reason resistive touchscreen styluses don&#039;t work on capacitative touchscreens is because they&#039;re usually made out of plastic, which is a non-conductive material. Styluses for capacitative touchscreens do exist, with the tip made of conductive material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to point out that capacitative touchscreens don&#8217;t sense body heat. What they sense is the electrical conductivity of your finger. The reason resistive touchscreen styluses don&#8217;t work on capacitative touchscreens is because they&#8217;re usually made out of plastic, which is a non-conductive material. Styluses for capacitative touchscreens do exist, with the tip made of conductive material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP8 (WebM) vs H.264 (MP4) &#8211; August 2010 by Pacoup</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2010/08/09/vp8-webm-vs-h-264-mp4-august-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-12632</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1291#comment-12632</guid>
		<description>I think so Ivan. I&#039;ll have to do more tests to have a definite conclusion on this. But in theory, yes, WebM and VP8 have gotten better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think so Ivan. I&#8217;ll have to do more tests to have a definite conclusion on this. But in theory, yes, WebM and VP8 have gotten better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP8 (WebM) vs H.264 (MP4) &#8211; August 2010 by Ivan</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2010/08/09/vp8-webm-vs-h-264-mp4-august-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-12491</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1291#comment-12491</guid>
		<description>They have improved?? Didn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have improved?? Didn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List of True 16:9 Resolutions by Dean</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/06/12/list-of-true-169-resolutions/comment-page-1/#comment-12406</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1717#comment-12406</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Pacoup</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.drazzil.com/?page_id=2#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>Well, this is actually the default theme from the newest version of WordPress. I&#039;m that lazy!

I just changed the banner image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is actually the default theme from the newest version of WordPress. I&#8217;m that lazy!</p>
<p>I just changed the banner image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Todd</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-12187</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.drazzil.com/?page_id=2#comment-12187</guid>
		<description>I stumbled upon your website looking for true 16x9 resolutions. Thank you for providing, it has helped me tremendously. I had a question about your blog/website. What theme are you using from wordpress? or is it custom?

Thanks again,

Todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled upon your website looking for true 16&#215;9 resolutions. Thank you for providing, it has helped me tremendously. I had a question about your blog/website. What theme are you using from wordpress? or is it custom?</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>Todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash vs HTML5 Performance (Updated January 2012) by Pacoup</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2011/02/03/flash-vs-html5-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-12168</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacoup.com/?p=1657#comment-12168</guid>
		<description>And then people still debate whether Flash is going away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then people still debate whether Flash is going away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

