<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pacoup.com &#187; Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacoup.com/category/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacoup.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Speed is not all about Load Speed</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/21/browser-speed-is-not-all-about-load-speed/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=browser-speed-is-not-all-about-load-speed</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/21/browser-speed-is-not-all-about-load-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever had this weird feeling that although Google Chrome itself was quick, the page was dreadfully slow? If yes, it&#8217;s perfectly normal, because Google Chrome may be the worst in dynamic page render speed. Hmm, what&#8217;s dynamic page &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/21/browser-speed-is-not-all-about-load-speed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/21/browser-speed-is-not-all-about-load-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left in the dust: IE&#8217;s demise</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/19/left-in-the-dust/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=left-in-the-dust</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/19/left-in-the-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Acid2 was released, it took a few months for Safari to pass it (webkit), a year for Opera (presto) and 3 for Firefox. Internet Explorer took 4 years, with the release of Internet Explorer 8. Now that Acid3 is &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/19/left-in-the-dust/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/19/left-in-the-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Object Oriented CSS &#8211; A Primer</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/17/object-oriented-css-a-primer/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=object-oriented-css-a-primer</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/17/object-oriented-css-a-primer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preface Object Oriented CSS (OOCSS) has recently made some buzz in the web industry and for very good reasons. It&#8217;s the kind of thing I go: why didn&#8217;t I think about this? As a CSS architect, I&#8217;m very enchanted to &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/17/object-oriented-css-a-primer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/17/object-oriented-css-a-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 10 Unite</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/16/opera-10-unite/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=opera-10-unite</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/16/opera-10-unite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was very critical in my last review of Opera Software&#8217;s Ian Hickson for his design choices in the latest beta of Opera 10. Either they listened or a lot of people raved about that because they made a few &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/16/opera-10-unite/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/16/opera-10-unite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fastest browser on Mac OS X Leopard &#8211; 06/2009</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/14/the-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-leopard-062009/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-leopard-062009</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/14/the-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-leopard-062009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browsers - Mozilla Firefox 3.5b4 - Apple Safari 4.0 (5530.17) - Opera 10.00 Beta V8 Benchmark Fastest: Safari Firefox: 272 Safari: 2676 Opera: 188 Sunspider Benchmark Fastest: Safari Firefox: 1044.6 Safari: 895.4 Opera: 4006.8 Tables Fastest: Safari Firefox: 297 Safari: &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/14/the-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-leopard-062009/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/14/the-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-leopard-062009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes IE is slow, Yes Firefox is slow, Yes Safari on Windows is slow&#8230;but!</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/12/yes-ie-is-slow-yes-firefox-is-low-yes-safari-on-windows-is-slow/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=yes-ie-is-slow-yes-firefox-is-low-yes-safari-on-windows-is-slow</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/12/yes-ie-is-slow-yes-firefox-is-low-yes-safari-on-windows-is-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love these tests. Thank you Lifehacker. Wasn&#8217;t it freaken obvious that Chrome was faster. Doesn&#8217;t take a genius to figure out Apple&#8217;s and Microsoft&#8217;s in-lab tests are just a load of bull. Browser speed isn&#8217;t solely dependent on how &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/12/yes-ie-is-slow-yes-firefox-is-low-yes-safari-on-windows-is-slow/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/12/yes-ie-is-slow-yes-firefox-is-low-yes-safari-on-windows-is-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing! Not so much</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/bing-not-so-much/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=bing-not-so-much</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/bing-not-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, turns out market share for Bing dropped after that special day, go read on TechCrunch. But anyway, with all niceties aside and the fact that Bing simply doesn&#8217;t help you more if you don&#8217;t live in some of the &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/bing-not-so-much/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/bing-not-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave, HTML 5 and Webkit</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/google-wave-html-5-and-webkit/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=google-wave-html-5-and-webkit</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/google-wave-html-5-and-webkit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Developement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this year&#8217;s Google I/O, we&#8217;ve had a taste of this very sweet thing called Google Wave. I&#8217;m totally sold, this thing really is email invented and I think once people realize how powerful it is, and when people try &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/google-wave-html-5-and-webkit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/08/google-wave-html-5-and-webkit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing! It works!</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/05/bing-it-works/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=bing-it-works</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/05/bing-it-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if you saw my article titled Bing!, you know that in my head Bing was a stupid rename of Live search. But, it works! Yes, Bing effectively jumped pass Yahoo&#8217;s share of the market in the last few days. &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/05/bing-it-works/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/05/bing-it-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 10 Beta &#8211; First Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta-first-thoughts/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=opera-10-beta-first-thoughts</link>
		<comments>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta-first-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pacoup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacoup.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speed Improvements Although I didn&#8217;t benchmark anything, as always there&#8217;s nothing to be said about Opera&#8217;s speed. It&#8217;s still a zippy browser with a really high tech JavaScript, HTML and CSS render engine. New Interface Skin The new interface skin &#8230; <a href="http://pacoup.com/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta-first-thoughts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacoup.com/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta-first-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
